• 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会无损检测分会会刊
高级检索

磁粉检验用B型环的评价

潘建华

潘建华. 磁粉检验用B型环的评价[J]. 无损检测, 2011, 33(9): 82-86.
引用本文: 潘建华. 磁粉检验用B型环的评价[J]. 无损检测, 2011, 33(9): 82-86.
PAN JianHua. Evaluation of B Type Ring for Magnetic Particle Inspection[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2011, 33(9): 82-86.
Citation: PAN JianHua. Evaluation of B Type Ring for Magnetic Particle Inspection[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2011, 33(9): 82-86.

磁粉检验用B型环的评价

详细信息
    作者简介:

    潘建华(1954-),男,高级工程师,长期从事飞机发动机无损检测工作。

  • 中图分类号: TG115.28

Evaluation of B Type Ring for Magnetic Particle Inspection

  • 摘要: 使用中发现,B型试块标准和使用要求与Ketos环和AS5282环试块存在差异。为此对三种试块的标准和使用现状进行了调查,对试块的硬度、磁化电流对应显现孔数以及表面剩余漏磁场等进行了对比测试和分析。结果表明,B型试块作为标准试块使用时存在不确定性。同时对B型试块标准GB/T 23906—2009和MH/T 3008—2004提出了修改建议。
    Abstract: B Type rings were found different with Ketos ring and AS5282 ring on the standards and application requirements in using. The three rings were surveyed for their standards and application status, and were tested and investigated for their hardness, the number of the indicated holes corresponding with magnetic current, and leakage field measurement for each hole of rings. The results showed that there was an uncertainty when B Type rings were used as a standard of rings. It is advised that B Type rings standard GB/T 23906—2009 and MH/T 3008—2004 should be revised.
  • [1] Hagemaier D J. Evaluation of steel ring standards for magnetic particle inspection[J]. Materials Evaluation,1993,51(9):1046-1051.
    [2] Hagemaier D J. 1993 Evaluation of steel ring standards for magnetic particle inspection[J]. Materials Evaluation,1996,54(10):1207-1209.
    [3] Bates B, Hagemaier D J. Evaluation of steel ring standards for magnetic particle testing[J]. Materials Evaluation,1997,55(10):1070-1072.
    [4] 《美国无损检测手册》译审委员会.美国无损检测手册. 磁粉卷[M].上海:世界图书出版公司,1994:346-347.
    [5] 仲维畅.磁粉探伤中Betz环的近似理论[J].无损检测,2008,30(12):903-905.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2010-12-29
  • 刊出日期:  2011-09-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回