“π”形管道点焊工装焊疤部位的磁粉检测

详细信息

Magnetic powder detection of spot welding tooling scar of “π” shaped pipe

1. Sinopec International Co., Ltd., Beijing 100000, China;
2. Material Science and Engineering Department, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

摘要: 通过对撬装设备“π”形管道点焊工装的实施效果进行调查,并对工装焊接部位进行了目视宏观检验和磁粉检测,认为其工装焊疤部位的宏观检查无法发现某些裂纹,而采用磁粉检测方法可发现。“π”形管尺寸越大,工装焊疤部位越容易产生裂纹。建议对标准GB/T20801.4—2020《压力管道规范》的有关内容进行修改,以免在执行过程中产生异议。同时建议选用不伤害管道的非点焊辅助机械支撑工装。
- “π”形管道 /
- 点焊工装 /
- 工装焊疤 /
- 焊接裂纹
Abstract: This paper investigated on the implementation effect of point welding tooling on “π” pipe for the prisking equipment, visual macro testing and magnetic particle testing were carried out for the welding parts of the tooling, and found out that the macro inspection of “π” pipe welding scar site cannot detect the defect,but applying magnetic powder detection could find out the defect. The larger the “π”shaped pipe, the easier the weld scar cracks. It was recommended that the GB/T 20801. 4—2020 standard be modified to avoid objection during implementation. It was recommended to choose the non-spot welding auxiliary mechanical support tooling that does not damage the pipeline.
- “π” shaped pipe /
- spot welding tooling /
- tooling welding scar /
- welding crack

[1]	LU S L,HAN Y,QIN C Y,et al. Crack and fitness-for-service assessment of ERW crude oil pipeline[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2006,13(4):565-571.
[2]	吕拴录,袁鹏斌,夏锋社,等. 输气管道对接焊缝破裂原因分析[J]. 中国特种设备安全,2006,22(12):32-35.
[3]	吕拴录,韩勇,赵新伟,等.273.1 mm×6.0 mm ERW管线管破裂原因分析[J].管道技术与装备,2005(4):19-21.
[4]	吕拴录,康延军,乐法国,等. 某输油管道刺漏调查分析[J]. 管道技术与设备,2010(1):48-49.
[5]	吕拴录,韩勇,李金凤,等. 输气管道用无缝管线管表面发纹的检验与判定[J]. 钢管,2010,39(3):48-51.
[6]	YUAN Pengbin,LV Shuanlu,LUO Faqian,et al. Internal pressure test succeeds where other measures fail[J]. Oil & Gas,2010,8:5-52.