Penetrant and eddy current testing of tail pipe component of aircraft auxiliary power unit
-
摘要: 以某型号辅助动力装置(APU)尾管组件为研究对象,根据其材料、结构及所处的工作环境,考虑检测成本及可操作性,选择渗透检测法和涡流检测法对其进行检测,并就工作环境、工作准备、工艺流程等方面对这两种检测方法进行了比较。试验结果表明,两种检测方法均能检测出该尾管组件的典型裂纹缺陷。Abstract: Taking a certain type of auxiliary power unit (APU) tail pipe assembly as the research object, according to its material, structure and working environment, considering the inspection cost and operability, penetrant testing and eddy current testing are selected for its inspection. The two detection methods are compared in terms of working environment, work preparation, and process flow. The test results show that both detection methods can detect the typical crack defects of the tail tube assembly.
-
-
[1] 高晗, 喻星星.航空导管连接卡箍的荧光渗透检测[J].无损检测,2015,37(1):72-74. [2] 王树志, 刘广华,王本志,等.表面状态对钛合金铸件荧光渗透检测结果的影响试验研究[J].无损检测,2017,39(10):54-58. [3] 李林贤, 董璐.极薄部位贯穿型缺陷的渗透检测[J].石油和化工设备,2017,20(4):77-78. [4] 杨志伟. 低温环境下渗透检测灵敏度的提高[J].无损检测,2006,28(8):423-425,430. [5] 杨宾峰, 罗飞路.脉冲涡流检测系统影响因素分析[J].无损检测,2008,30(2):104-106. [6] 张海兵, 袁英民.某型发动机2级压气机叶片的涡流探伤方法[J].无损检测,2011,33(2):24-26. [7] KISELEV E K,GOL'DSHTEIN A E.Eddy-current system for testing inner diameter of pipes[J].Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing,2019,55(3):210-216.
计量
- 文章访问数: 4
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 3