高级检索

    奥氏体不锈钢马氏体含量的杂散磁场检测与涡流检测

    Stray magnetic field detection and eddy current detection of martensite content in austenitic stainless steel

    • 摘要: 为了比较杂散磁场和涡流检测技术对奥氏体不锈钢马氏体含量的检测能力,制备了铁素体含量系列标准试块、马氏体含量系列试样和管道弯头工件,并开展了两种检测技术对不同马氏体含量的信号响应试验、磁各向异性试验、同种材料不同马氏体含量检测试验和现场管道弯头的检测试验。试验结果表明,受工件的磁各向异性和环境磁场等因素影响,杂散磁场检测技术检测结果与马氏体含量的对应关系差;但这些因素对涡流检测技术的影响较小,因此,对于奥氏体不锈钢马氏体含量的现场检测,涡流检测技术要优于杂散磁场检测技术。

       

      Abstract: In order to compare the detection capabilities of stray magnetic field and eddy current detection techniques for martensite content in austenitic stainless steel, a series of standard test blocks for ferrite content, a series of martensite content samples, and pipeline elbow workpieces were prepared. Two detection techniques were carried out, including signal response tests for different martensite contents, magnetic anisotropy tests, detection tests for different martensite contents of the same material, and on-site pipeline elbow detection tests. The experimental results showed that due to factors such as magnetic anisotropy of the workpiece and environmental magnetic field, the correlation between the detection results of stray magnetic field detection technology and martensite content was poor. However, these factors had a relatively small impact on eddy current testing technology. Therefore, for on-site detection of martensite content in austenitic stainless steel, eddy current testing technology was superior to stray magnetic field testing technology.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回