Comparison and analysis of three time-base linear test methods in GB/T 27664 standard
-
摘要: 超声检测设备的时基线性直接影响缺陷定位的准确度。标准GB/T 27664.1－2011仪器部分的8.7节和9.6节，以及GB/T 27664.3－2012组合设备部分的3.2节指出了测试时基线性的不同方法。采用了标准中提出的3种不同方法对同一台超声检测仪的时基线性进行测试，对这3种时基线性的测试方法做出了详细对比。结果表明，标准中仪器部分8.7节的方法适用于数字式超声检测仪，其验收标准为时基线性偏差小于全屏宽度的±0.5%；9.6节的方法适用于A型脉冲式模拟和数字式超声检测仪，验收标准为时基线性偏差小于全屏宽度的±1%；组合设备部分3.2节的方法适用于现场或车间条件使用的超声仪器和探头组合设备，验收标准为时基线性偏差小于全屏宽度的±2%。Abstract: For ultrasonic testing equipment, the linearity of time base directly affects the accuracy of defect location determination. Three test methods are described in the term 8. 7 and term 9. 6 of GB/T 27664. 1-2011, as well as in the term 3. 2 of GB/T 27664. 3-2012. The above-mentioned three ways were used to conduct testing and make comparison on the linearity of time base of the same digital ultrasonic instrument. The results showed that term 8. 7 is applicable to the measurement of digital ultrasonic instrument, with which the acceptance standard is within ±0. 5% of the full screen width; the term 9. 6 can be applied to the A-type pulse analogue and digital ultrasonic instrument, with which the acceptance standard is within ±1% of the full screen width; and the term 3. 2 is suitable for the ultrasonic instruments combined with detector practically used on site or in plants, with which the acceptance criteria is within ±2% of full screen width.
-
Keywords:
- ultrasonic testing /
- linearity of time base /
- standard /
- testing method
-
-
[1] 潘强华,郑晖,张君娇,等.国内外超声检测仪器测试与评价标准的比较与分析[J].无损检测,2017,39(3):5-9,54. [2] 王建忠,卢天惠,何靖,等.模拟式与数字式A型脉冲反射式超声检测仪时基线的差异[J].无损探伤,2018,42(2):37-39.
计量
- 文章访问数: 7
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 5
下载:
