• 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会无损检测分会会刊
高级检索

奥氏体焊缝的两种超声检测方法对比

张国强, 强天鹏, 龚成刚, 王道才, 孟辉

张国强, 强天鹏, 龚成刚, 王道才, 孟辉. 奥氏体焊缝的两种超声检测方法对比[J]. 无损检测, 2022, 44(7): 29-32. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc202207007
引用本文: 张国强, 强天鹏, 龚成刚, 王道才, 孟辉. 奥氏体焊缝的两种超声检测方法对比[J]. 无损检测, 2022, 44(7): 29-32. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc202207007
ZHANG Guoqiang, QIANG Tianpeng, GONG Chenggang, WANG Daocai, MENG Hui. Comparison of two ultrasonic testing methods for austenitic welds[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2022, 44(7): 29-32. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc202207007
Citation: ZHANG Guoqiang, QIANG Tianpeng, GONG Chenggang, WANG Daocai, MENG Hui. Comparison of two ultrasonic testing methods for austenitic welds[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2022, 44(7): 29-32. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc202207007

奥氏体焊缝的两种超声检测方法对比

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张国强(1987-),男,工程师,主要从事无损检测技术工作

    通讯作者:

    强天鹏,E-mail:13776663939@vip.163.com

  • 中图分类号: TG115.28

Comparison of two ultrasonic testing methods for austenitic welds

  • 摘要: 结合工程应用数据,对全聚焦相控阵超声和双晶聚焦纵波斜探头超声两种技术的粗晶焊缝质量检测结果进行了对比分析,得到两种技术的信噪比数据、缺陷检出能力数据以及扫查覆盖能力的评价结果,指出了全聚焦相控阵检测技术具有覆盖范围大的特性,可减少扫查次数,提高检测速度,降低缺陷漏检的概率。
    Abstract: Combined with the engineering application data, the results of coarse-grained weld quality inspection by full focus phased array ultrasound and double crystal focused longitudinal wave angle probe ultrasound are compared and analyzed. The signal-to-noise ratio data, defect detection ability data and scanning coverage ability of the two technologies are obtained. It is pointed out that the full focus phased array inspection technology is characteristic of large coverage, which can reduce the scanning times and improve the detection speed, and thus decreasing the rate of undetected defects.
  • [1] 强天鹏,杨贵德,杜南开,等.全聚焦相控阵技术的场测量研究[J].无损检测,2020,42(2):1-6.
    [2] 强天鹏,杨贵德,杜南开,等.全聚焦相控阵技术声场特性初探[J].无损检测,2020,42(1):1-6.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  10
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  11
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-14
  • 刊出日期:  2022-07-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回