Internal inspection data comparison in long distance oil and gas pipelines
-
摘要: 管道内检测数据是目前国内外长输油气管道完整性管理基础数据的来源，内检测数据的比对是内检测数据深度挖掘和综合利用的主要方向。调研和综述了国内外管道内检测数据比对的发展状况，详细介绍了管道内检测数据比对的主要内容，在环焊缝等基础信息的比对，变形、金属损失和焊缝缺陷的比对，以及管道坐标比对的基础上，提出了内检测数据比对方面的建议，对内检测数据比对技术的提升具有重要的实际意义。Abstract: Internal inspection data are currently the source of basic data for the integrity management of long distance oil and gas pipelines at home and abroad. The comparison of internal inspection data is the main direction for deep mining and comprehensive utilization of internal inspection data. The development status of internal inspection data comparison at home and abroad was investigated and summarized, and then the main contents of internal inspection data comparison were introduced in detail: comparison of basic information such as girth weld, deformation, metal loss and weld defect comparison, pipeline coordinates. Suggestions on the comparison of internal inspection data were put forward, which has important practical significance for the improvement of theoretical technology.
-
-
[1] 何仁洋, 唐鑫,赵雄,等.管道石油天然气腐蚀防护的相关技术研究进展[J].化工设备与管道,2013,50(1):53-55. [2] 冯庆善. 基于大数据条件下的管道风险评估方法思考[J].油气储运,2014,33(5):457-461. [3] GU B,KANIA R,SHARMA S,et al.Approach to assessment of corrosion growth in pipelines[C]//Proceedings of 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:[s.n.],2009:1837-1847.
[4] NESSIM M,DAWSON J,MORA R,et al.Obtaining corrosion growth rates from repeat in-line inspection runs and dealing with the measurement uncertainties[C]//Proceedings of 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference. Calgary:[s.n.],2009:593-600.
[5] DESJARDINS G,NICKLE R,SKIBINSKY D,et al.Comparison of in-line inspection service provider magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technology and analytical performance based on multiple runs on pipeline segments[C]//Proceedings of 2012 9th International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:[s.n.],2013:89-94.
[6] KARIYAWASAM S,WANG H.Useful trends for predicting corrosion growth[C]//Proceedings of 2012 9th International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:[s.n.],2013:245-256.
[7] DANN M R,DANN C.Automated matching of pipeline corrosion features from in-line inspection data[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2017,162:40-50.
[8] CHOQUETTE J J,CORNU S,ELSEIFY M,et al.Understanding pipeline strain conditions:case studies between ILI axial and ILI bending measurement techniques[C]//Proceedings of 2018 12th International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:[s.n.],2018.
[9] 王良军, 李强,梁菁嬿.长输管道内检测数据比对国内外现状及发展趋势[J].油气储运,2015,34(3):233-236. [10] 林现喜, 李银喜,周信,等.大数据环境下管道内检测数据管理[J].油气储运,2015,34(4):349-353. [11] 李睿, 张琳,赵晓利,等.油气长输管道长期应变及位移监测[J].石油机械,2016,44(6):118-122. [12] 姜晓红, 洪险峰,刘争,等.管道内检测数据对比对完整性评价的影响[J].油气储运,2016,35(1):28-31. [13] 王丹丹, 林晓,骆秀媛,等.海底管道两轮漏磁内检测数据的比对方法[J].船海工程,2016,45(3):122-126,130. [14] 孙浩, 帅健.长输管道内检测数据比对方法[J].油气储运,2017,36(7):775-780,794. [15] 季寿宏, 丁楠,张国民,等.管道内检测数据比对分析软件开发及应用研究[J].石油化工自动化,2018,54(4):47-51,60. [16] 王波, 吕超,明连勋,等.基于不同内检测数据的对齐与分析研究[J].管道技术与设备,2019(5):24-27. [17] 杨贺, 刘新凌,李强,等.油气管道多轮内检测数据对齐算法研究及应用[J].管道技术与设备,2020(1):21-24,28. [18] 陈翠翠. 长输管道漏磁内检测数据的对比及综合应用[J].石油和化工设备,2020,23(3):71-74. [19] 王富祥, 玄文博,陈健,等.基于漏磁内检测的管道环焊缝缺陷识别与判定[J].油气储运,2017,36(2):161-170.
计量
- 文章访问数: 7
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 3
下载:
