• 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会无损检测分会会刊
高级检索

表面开口缺陷高度的测量方法对比

金晓明, 余哲, 孙加伟, 肖学柱

金晓明, 余哲, 孙加伟, 肖学柱. 表面开口缺陷高度的测量方法对比[J]. 无损检测, 2018, 40(4): 58-61. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc201804012
引用本文: 金晓明, 余哲, 孙加伟, 肖学柱. 表面开口缺陷高度的测量方法对比[J]. 无损检测, 2018, 40(4): 58-61. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc201804012
JIN Xiaoming, YU Zhe, SUN Jiawei, XIAO Xuezhu. Comparison of Height Measurement Methods for Surface Breaking Defects[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2018, 40(4): 58-61. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc201804012
Citation: JIN Xiaoming, YU Zhe, SUN Jiawei, XIAO Xuezhu. Comparison of Height Measurement Methods for Surface Breaking Defects[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2018, 40(4): 58-61. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc201804012

表面开口缺陷高度的测量方法对比

详细信息
    作者简介:

    金晓明(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事核电站在役检查技术研究与超声波换能器开发工作

    通讯作者:

    金晓明, E-mail:jingxiaoming20110805@cgnpc.com.cn

  • 中图分类号: TG115.28

Comparison of Height Measurement Methods for Surface Breaking Defects

  • 摘要: 表面开口类缺陷的检测和高度的测量对核电设备寿命的评估意义重大。分别利用常规超声端点衍射法与TOFD(衍射时差法)方法对表面开口缺陷的高度进行了测量并对结果进行了比较,得出结论:检测高度小于4 mm的开口缺陷时,常规超声端点衍射法分辨力下降严重;TOFD方法利用A扫信号可以区分1 mm高度的开口缺陷;随着表面开口缺陷高度的增加,两种方法测量结果基本一致。
    Abstract: It is of significance to detect and measure the height of cracks in order to assess the life of nuclear power equipment. In this paper, the measurements of the height of surface breaking defects by conventional UT tip diffraction method and TOFD method were compared. The conclusion was drawn:for breaking defect of height being less than 4mm, the resolution of conventional UT tip diffraction method decreases sharply; using TOFD with A scan can distinguish breaking defect of height greater than 1mm. With the increase of breaking defect height, two methods of measuring results are basically identical.
  • [1] 王春艳,柯常波,陈铁群.表面开口裂纹高度的超声无损测定[J].压力容器,2008,25(12):49-52.
    [2] 宋正升. 超声端点衍射法测定柱孔高度[J].无损检测,2004,26(10):520-522.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-07-15
  • 刊出日期:  2018-04-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回