Advanced Search
    LIN Shanshan, KANG Da, LI Xinhua, MA Zhaoguang, JIANG Yunxi, XU Rongbo, LIU Ying, ZHANG Hong. Comparison between computed radiography testing and conventional radiography testing for typical defective components[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2021, 43(11): 23-26,57. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc202111005
    Citation: LIN Shanshan, KANG Da, LI Xinhua, MA Zhaoguang, JIANG Yunxi, XU Rongbo, LIU Ying, ZHANG Hong. Comparison between computed radiography testing and conventional radiography testing for typical defective components[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2021, 43(11): 23-26,57. DOI: 10.11973/wsjc202111005

    Comparison between computed radiography testing and conventional radiography testing for typical defective components

    • In order to further study the differences between computed radiography(CR) testing technique and conventional radiography testing (RT) technique, components with typical defects such as pores, cracks and incomplete penetration were taken as the research object, and the results between CR testing and conventional RT were analyzed. To a certain extent, the equivalence of the two is verified, which lays a foundation for the subsequent application of actual product testing.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return